What Does case law property sale on special power of attorney Mean?
What Does case law property sale on special power of attorney Mean?
Blog Article
Because the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been attained, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) from the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution may be justified when the basic norm underlying a Constitution disappears as well as a new system is place in its place.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents with the boy or Female don't approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they're able to do if they're able to Reduce off social relations with the son or the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this kind of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or guy that's a major, the few is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who offers these kinds of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by law.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
This is because transfer orders are typically regarded within the administrative discretion with the employer. However, there may very well be exceptions in cases where the transfer is enthusiastic by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They could have grounds to challenge before the suitable forum. Read more
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement with the laws, the legal system adheres on the doctrine of stare decisis
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice from the Peace u/s 22-A is just not obliged to afford a possibility of hearing towards the accused party; nor obliged to essentially or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is needed to consider all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are some of the relevant factors. Read more
However it really is made clear that police is free to get action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities subject matter to regulation. However no harassment shall be caused into the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of here law. Police shall also guarantee regard of your family drop in accordance with legislation and whenever they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they might act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall safe concrete evidence and procure necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate to be a issue of security in the house is concerned, which will not be public place under the Act 1977. nine. Considering the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition is realized. Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of in the terms stated over. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads forty Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Only the written opinions of your Supreme Court along with the Court of Appeals are routinely obtainable. Decisions with the reduced (trial) courts are not generally published or distributed.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle proven by a court, which other courts are obligated to comply with.
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative from the legislation laid down with the Supreme Court from the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Thus, the competent authority of your parent department from the petitioner and also the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount in the petitioner and fork out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits into the petitioner to which he is entitled under the regulation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority from the respondent can also be directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability in the matter, but could not be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request towards the appellate court.
seventeen . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have listened to the acquired counsel with the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard for the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession with the subjected premises for the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this aspect for interim custody of the subject premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, It is additionally a nicely-proven proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject matter to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.